>I'm not sure how that couldn't be an argument to break up all the large states It might be worth considering some kind of population density clause for when t

>I'm not sure how that couldn't be an argument to break up all the large states It might be worth considering some kind of population density clause for when the number of constituents to representatives reaches a ridiculous value. >You should instead get the congress to move over to a parliamentary system where all percentages of votes are counted instead of a plurality takes all. This kind of a fix isn't pragmatic and will have a bigger disruption than breaking up one state. It's not like the geography is going to change because the lines are redrawn. >And then you will not be breaking up my home state with these outsider ideas. Have you considered whether other residents of the state share your view? Maybe the larger metropolitan areas are alright keeping around the sparser rural areas, but not the inverse?