1) No, this is not against the 1st amendment. You do not have free speech at work, and before he signs this he is still employed. 2) He would not have signed

1) No, this is not against the 1st amendment. You do not have free speech at work, and before he signs this he is still employed. 2) He would not have signed it under duress because he does not have to sign it. It could be argued, but he'd probably lose. I wouldn't think either party would want to go to court over 2 weeks pay either way.