> The lionization of Snowden is baffling when it was already well-known. No it wasn't. It was well suspected by a few. Snowden provided hard evidence which eac

> The lionization of Snowden is baffling when it was already well-known. No it wasn't. It was well suspected by a few. Snowden provided hard evidence which each and everyone could see. To many, if not most ordinary americans, that is a huge difference.