4 ms·
You added a word: "government censorship". This is the same argument that companies like to use when they shift blame onto a third-party contractor. Back to m
by nodata 13y ago
You added a word: "government censorship".
This is the same argument that companies like to use when they shift blame onto a third-party contractor.
Back to my question though. Third party or not, how is this not censorship?
(Your example of modesty sleeves is a bad one: the filter doesn't apply only to "adult magazines" (porn sites, here) but to lots of other non-"adult" content too.)
- DanBC 13y agoThe filters are optional. It isn't censorship if it's voluntary. The filters are different on each ISP. It's not censorship if the customer can shop around. Individual companies cannot censor something. There are no penalties for accessing this material even if you do so without turning the filter off.