28 ms·
Curiously, the URL seems exactly identical in both submissions, which are almost consecutive ( ...94, ...96). That probably means the duplicate detector has so
by ableal 13y ago
Curiously, the URL seems exactly identical in both submissions, which are almost consecutive ( ...94, ...96).
That probably means the duplicate detector has some delay on getting its past submissions data. The rate of submissions these days seems to average one a minute, but the delta on this pair may be different, and it is not apparent by now.
- __david__ 13y agoI can't tell now that the other one is dead, but I believe it's link was http: while this one's is https:. I use the "https everywhere" browser extension so when I copied the URL I probably got the upgraded one. I think that explains why the dup detector didn't catch it. I don't know why this story took off and the other died. Maybe the headline?
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]