6 ms·
yeah I did not get the explanation of why he did not use Tesseract. It seems like a "self evident" argument was dropped, but I am not in the know about why it's
by tlarkworthy 13y ago
yeah I did not get the explanation of why he did not use Tesseract. It seems like a "self evident" argument was dropped, but I am not in the know about why it's obviously not possible. My guess is that Tesseract is spread across 100 files and does a ton of IO or something that can't be translated easily??? Dunno
- dbaupp 13y agoAt the end of http://antimatter15.github.io/ocrad.js/demo.html http://antimatter15.github.io/ocrad.js/demo.html, "When you include the training data, Tesseract is actually kind of massive — A functional Emscripten port would probably be at least 30 times the size of OCRAD.js!"
- jahewson 13y agoWhy include the traing data? There's no need to train on the browser, do it with the native app and just port the code to run the neural nets to the browser. It should be a fraction of the size.