4 ms·
FWIW, just a few days ago I was browsing through the Emacs Bzr repository - after a full bzr clone, that took ridiculously long as well, a simple bzr blame take
by stiff 13y ago
FWIW, just a few days ago I was browsing through the Emacs Bzr repository - after a full bzr clone, that took ridiculously long as well, a simple bzr blame takes 40-60 seconds to execute locally, and I have an SSD drive, four-core intel i7 and 8GB of RAM. I have never seen this kind of slowness with Git, with any repository size.
- __david__ 13y agoOh yeah, doing anything with bzr and Emacs is just painful. For fun, check your CPU usage while your doing that bzr blame. I did one recently and it pegs at 100% for the whole time. Git is way more efficient.
- mathattack 13y agoDoes this make the issue a critique of RMS's management style, or of the FSF licensing that is unable to back out of a failed project?
- justincormack 13y agoIf you look at the thread, it seems to be neither, just inertia. The licensing is fine, its GPL, no different from bzr.
- drzaiusapelord 13y agoInertia seems to fit with bad management style. Good managers should be fighting it when it becomes cumbersome. Stop making excuses for FOSS celebrities and start demanding better outcomes.