Most people probably have no idea what they're voting for, which is a shame, but they are given the option to decide their own fates, and they can only blame th

Most people probably have no idea what they're voting for, which is a shame, but they are given the option to decide their own fates, and they can only blame themselves if things go to shit. Direct democracy can be self-correcting - if people realize things are going to shit they can change it - this can't happen with a government of rogue politicians taking bribes left and right, and where these elite groups live under a separate rule of law to the rest. What I find absurd is the belief of some that we live in a free or equal society, when the whole concept is based on "You're too stupid to decide for yourself, serf". The obvious undemocratic thing about our alleged democracies is the absence of "None of the above" on the ballot, or the failure to count non-votes as a legitimate position - of not supporting any party or person, but oneself. I honestly don't expect many people to elect themselves are their own representative - most people will not have the time, nor the patience to do research (like any politician, really), in order to make informed decisions. I'd expect instead, a system where one can delegate their own decision making power to some third-party representative they can trust will use those votes in a sane way, but the most important requirement for such delegation of voting power is revocation ability (effective immediately rather than in 4-5 years or through violence), so that if said representative is taking bribes, or backpedaling on their promises, they can switch to someone else. We could probably build something like this with public-key crypto.