I was not mislead by the headline. It is open to more than one interpretation of course, but it is accurate (and sort of humorous) as written. The whole point

I was not mislead by the headline. It is open to more than one interpretation of course, but it is accurate (and sort of humorous) as written. The whole point of the article is a discussion about the line between "exploit" and "incredibly boneheaded app implementation" and where the responsibility should lie.