4 ms·
Yes, but if you statically link, the LGPL requires providing a way for a user to switch to a modified version of the library (e.g. a .a of the rest of the appl
by comex 13y ago
Yes, but if you statically link, the LGPL requires providing a way for a user to switch to a modified version of the library (e.g. a .a of the rest of the application), which is more hassle than just using dynamic linking.
- belorn 13y agoBy definition, dynamic linking will be less of an hassle (and give better performance) than statically linking. After all, this is the original purpose of dynamic linking. It is also more secure for the user of an computer system.