This is not correct. You're thinking of Apple's "warrant canary", which covered only Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act, "Access to records and other items unde

This is not correct. You're thinking of Apple's "warrant canary", which covered only Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act, "Access to records and other items under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act", aka mass FISA requests. Apple almost certainly has received many NSLs, which is why they can only disclose "1000-2000 account information requests" for the first half of 2013 in their transparency report. That number combines law enforcement and national security order requests in order to keep vague the exact number of the latter. If you take a look at that transparency report[1], you can see they come as close as you can to confirming that they have received NSLs when (so far) you can of course not confirm that you've ever received NSLs. [1] https://www.apple.com/pr/pdf/131105reportongovinforequests3.pdf https://www.apple.com/pr/pdf/131105reportongovinforequests3....