4 ms·
"There is no infringement in providing access in a good-faith belief that the content is legit." I don't believe that is true. Content distribution is a compli
by seanalltogether 13y ago
"There is no infringement in providing access in a good-faith belief that the content is legit."
I don't believe that is true. Content distribution is a complicated affair. Redistribution of content is not as easy as saying "well if site xyz has the right to distribute it, so do I"
- maxerickson 13y agoThe argument also hinges on the idea that the operator has "good-faith belief that the content is legit". Stating that you have this good faith belief is not actually the same thing as having it.
- coldtea 13y agoNot to mention that even having it doesn't mean anything at all. Or, well, it make not make it "willingly infringement", but it still makes it infringement.