3 ms·
I'd personally include the upswing on static site generators. Not exactly a traditional CMS, but still a system that manages content. In particular, I'd site N
by ericcholis 13y ago
I'd personally include the upswing on static site generators. Not exactly a traditional CMS, but still a system that manages content.
In particular, I'd site NPR's work on their static site process:
http://blog.apps.npr.org/2013/02/14/app-template-redux.html http://blog.apps.npr.org/2013/02/14/app-template-redux.html
- gadders 13y agoWhenever I hear of these static content generators, I think of Fog Creek's City Desk [1]. Time for it to make a come back? [1]http://www.fogcreek.com/citydesk/ http://www.fogcreek.com/citydesk/
- oneeyedpigeon 13y agoNPR stuff looks good, but their focus (from an initial skim) appears to be we apps - correct? That might be running before we can walk - how about getting all content-driven sites (blogs, portfolios, etc.) onto SSGs first - I think that's where the really big wins are.
- ericcholis 13y agoYes, I'd say that their sites fit into more of an "app" category. More reading, for the curious: http://blog.apps.npr.org/2013/09/13/using-a-static-site-to-crowdsource-playgrounds.html http://blog.apps.npr.org/2013/09/13/using-a-static-site-to-c...