> "I hear this fallacy question again an again. It implies that giving total power to gobertment is "security". It is not." You seemingly don't understand this

> "I hear this fallacy question again an again. It implies that giving total power to gobertment is "security". It is not." You seemingly don't understand this abstract trade-off the correct way. Nowhere did anybody state that giving total power to the government would be the way to gain total security. You could just as well create a giant prison run by a private corporation and put every single citizen permanently in a cell. Then you'd have basically no freedom and almost total security without any government involvement.