3 ms·
Star Trek is fun enough. But it's amazing to see what Lucas does with his saga on so many different levels. Anyone interested in film analysis and/or commentary
by trevelyan 17y ago
Star Trek is fun enough. But it's amazing to see what Lucas does with his saga on so many different levels. Anyone interested in film analysis and/or commentary might find this worth reading. I wrote it ages ago:
http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/38/clones1.htm http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/38/clones1.htm
- BearOfNH 17y agoNice write-up, it gives me some things to look for next time I watch the movies, like Amidala's costume color. Trek is a series of standalone 42-minute episodes written by different authors with different agendas. Wars is one man's vision and after the first movie Lucas had all the time and money required for the rest. So it's natural to think of Wars as a better "whole" than Trek. But in both cases I find myself wishing the vision and writing had been better. Does anybody over the age of 5 think Jar-Jar Binks was a good idea well-executed? No, he was just a plot device. Trek's Wesley Crusher is equally grating in most of his episodes. ("Wesley" is not to be confused with the talented Wil Wheaton, who deserved a better character.) But when I watch Babylon 5 or Battlestar Galactica, well, I don't think the writing is bad or the characters contrived. Better vision, better writing, better stories.