4 ms·
It wouldn't be hiding biases, it would be making them inconsequential. That's pretty much the best you can hope for, once you admit the possibility that there's
by wrongc0ntinent 13y ago
It wouldn't be hiding biases, it would be making them inconsequential. That's pretty much the best you can hope for, once you admit the possibility that there's no such state as bias-free.
- dinkumthinkum 13y agoSo what, you're going to get all the way to the job offer without knowing their name?
- MartinCron 13y agoLet's imagine an totally awesome resume from this candidate: - Kaytlyn (female, youngish, spelled unconventionally) - who graduated from WSU (the rival of my alma matter) - who has a 253 area code (my least favorite suburb) - who uses Papyrus for headings (my least favorite font) - with the email address belieber69@aol.com (triple yuck) I would want to get that person in for an interview and explicitly check the subtle biases of me and other people who are making hiring decisions. True story: when I was in college I had a classmate in my database class who was so good-looking it kind of hurt to look at her. I never once explicitly thought that she was a dumb blonde, but I was surprised when I found out that she was just brilliant. Similarly, I worked on a group project with a few prototypical "frat boys" with their Abercrombie sweaters and backwards baseball caps, and found myself surprised that they were smart as hell, too. I just want to give people an honest chance to be brilliant and not have their resumes passed over for bullshit reasons, even subconsciously.