The irony here is how you're able to leverage the publications[1] of PG to explain how the arguments in the parent-post are falling short in substantively criti

The irony here is how you're able to leverage the publications[1] of PG to explain how the arguments in the parent-post are falling short in substantively criticizing the publications by PG. Head: explode. 1: http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html