PG has a lot of integrity, something that warrants protecting, but this is not that big of a deal. Nobody will remember it in a few weeks and The Information p

PG has a lot of integrity, something that warrants protecting, but this is not that big of a deal. Nobody will remember it in a few weeks and The Information probably snagged as many new subs as they lost because of the publicity. I highly doubt they were attempting to make PG look bad on purpose and it was the other pub that drew attention to it or really, nobody would know about the edit. The whole thing is pretty silly, but I understand why PG is responding. It must be hard for some people to understand why there aren't more female founders, but that's not something he can change unless he decides to change his business, which is wildly successful... so why would he... ? People forget he runs a business and they think he just snaps his fingers and startups turn to gold regardless of the founders. He's always maintained it's all about the team. That will never change, male, female or robot.