4 ms·
Would a retraction/apology combination be effective here? Or is this just too egregious an error? I, in turn, feel dumb asking, as I would have liked a subscri
by HCIdivision17 13y ago
Would a retraction/apology combination be effective here? Or is this just too egregious an error?
I, in turn, feel dumb asking, as I would have liked a subscription to a service like that. I wouldn't want to encourage this sort of nonsense, either.
- Crito 13y ago"We reviewed the transcript again and shared it with Paul. We stand behind our excerpting and editing for clarity. We continue to believe that the quote is in its proper context. Thanks for checking in." http://valleywag.gawker.com/paul-graham-says-women-havent-been-hacking-for-the-pa-1490581236 http://valleywag.gawker.com/paul-graham-says-women-havent-be... I wouldn't hold my breath for a retraction/apology. It sounds like they have dug in their heals.
- HCIdivision17 13y agoAm I mistaken that this is related to ValleyWag's stance and not The Information? EDIT: yes, I am clearly mistaken on a second glance. I hadn't actually reached the end of the article's updates (curse browsing on a phone and careless reading).