I don't really see what's wrong since they're exploiting the way the Chinese do business. What's "wrong" is that it appears they may have been in violation of

I don't really see what's wrong since they're exploiting the way the Chinese do business. What's "wrong" is that it appears they may have been in violation of federal anti-bribery statutes. In particular this thing known as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The original article was pretty clear about this point, so it's hard to see how you don't "see" it.