3 ms·
1) True. This is a mild annoyance. Particularly I think that the -b flag of checkout should be removed and instead checkout functionality should be added to g
by Crito 13y ago
1) True. This is a mild annoyance. Particularly I think that the -b flag of checkout should be removed and instead checkout functionality should be added to git-branch.
2) I don't see the problem. reset, revert, and commit each do different things...
3) This hasn't been my experience. When in doubt, go with the top SO answer I guess?
4) Absolutely not a problem; this is a feature. Sequential numbering is not a powerful enough concept to fit what is possible in git. Just for starters it begins to break down when you realize that relativity of simultaneity kicks in with DVC.
5) What? How? I do that all the time...
6) If your team is refusing to work with each other, that is an organizational failing. You've got some problems there that are not related to git.
7) Wait, what UI are you normally using?
8) I suppose I can see this would be annoying if you are frequently pushing very large numbers of tags. Though the second complaint does not make sense to me; why would you configure your repo to reject pushed tags if you want to push tags? If you want to do that, then don't do that.
9) "That's a feature."™
10) Zero cryptic commands above. I aim to please.
11) Eh, such is language. I wouldn't be opposed to tightening up the docs, but I don't believe anybody really has serious issues with this.