> Communist hunters? Because I could have sworn we were smart folks trying to make the world a better place. No, more like misogynist-racist-capitalist hunters

> Communist hunters? Because I could have sworn we were smart folks trying to make the world a better place. No, more like misogynist-racist-capitalist hunters. We HN types are trying to profit. At best grabbing so much money with uninspiring "tech" that some will assume their rightful place as benevolent plutocrats playing SimEarth. > Shanley never misses a chance to go after Sarah Lacy Anyone can see for themselves that Sarah Lacy is happy to dish out more than she gets, even using a gender slur against women just trying to talk (scroll down to the video): (http://www.lemondrop.com/2010/09/28/techcrunch-women-in-tech-panel-sarah-lacy-rachel-sklar/ http://www.lemondrop.com/2010/09/28/techcrunch-women-in-tech...) > That's the modus operandae of these people: all it takes is one mistake And evidence accumulated over time. And HN posters like you making wild accusations without one single cite to back up your claims... which turn out flimsy when you actually research it. > It's not my fault I'm a white male But it's your fault that you act this way. When someone mentions how Shanley gets threats of murder, you downplay. Your hurt feelings are far more important to you. At least you "get that anonymous death threats are an issue". (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6983085 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6983085) Like the kind that attacked Kathy Sierra and her children. Because she dared speak her mind. (http://www.theverge.com/2013/9/12/4693710/the-end-of-kindness-weev-and-the-cult-of-the-angry-young-man http://www.theverge.com/2013/9/12/4693710/the-end-of-kindnes...) Yeah, people like you make the world a better place.