5 ms·
That's not an ad hominem attack. I wasn't saying your argument is wrong because you don't know how the world works. I was saying your argument is wrong because
by inklesspen 19y ago
That's not an ad hominem attack. I wasn't saying your argument is wrong because you don't know how the world works. I was saying your argument is wrong because of X, Y, and Z, and incidentally you don't know how the world works.
Your responses continue to show that you don't know how the world works. You aren't going to find DNA patterns that are beneficial to your company. Identical twins with identical DNA can have incredibly different personalities. Humans share 94% of our DNA with chimpanzees, amichall.
In conclusion, please go watch Gattaca and then go join the real world for a bit.
- amichail 19y agoWell, I'm certainly not going to insult you, whether it's part of my argument or not. I may not reply to your future comments though.
- pg 19y agoThat's not an ad hominem attack. Technically, perhaps, but it was name-calling. I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't do that.
- brlewis 19y agoYou have to get extremely technical to claim that "either severely misinformed about the world or an idiot" is not an ad-hominem attack. Perhaps a compiler could not prove that the ad-hominem is reachable, but all us humans see it.