I can't really imagine too many better firsthand accounts than someone who actually worked on a drone program. Would you have the guardian publish only secondha

I can't really imagine too many better firsthand accounts than someone who actually worked on a drone program. Would you have the guardian publish only secondhand opinion pieces? Fwiw they also published an op ed by a defence minister and linked to it twice in this article so I don't see the manipulation angle on a newspaper wide scale, although obviously the guardian editorial board has some strong opinions. Stronger than other newspapers? You'd have to make that case. Incidentally, while I appreciate your attempt to keep a clear head, your comment that things are complex applies to almost any situation worth discussing.