3 ms·
This was essentially my point. If PG is "ageist" in funding decisions, it's because most credible 40+ founders can already cover a few months of living expenses
by michaelochurch 13y ago
This was essentially my point. If PG is "ageist" in funding decisions, it's because most credible 40+ founders can already cover a few months of living expenses.
I do think that PG has been tied in (probably not through any fault of his own) with the age-discrimination culture of the Valley. But that's not PG's fault and he can't really do anything about it anyway.
- zw123456 13y agoI agree with your point about an "ageist" culture in the valley. An interesting idea I think would be a funding group organized around older entrepreneurs. With so many trying to emulate the success of the valley, maybe the opportunity is in targeting what the valley is missing?