4 ms·
He disagreed with the grandparent's skewed analysis, and explained why. Why don't you do the same rather than conflating "things I don't agree with" and "not r
by alextingle 13y ago
He disagreed with the grandparent's skewed analysis, and explained why.
Why don't you do the same rather than conflating "things I don't agree with" and "not really constructive discussion"?
- Houshalter 13y agoThe comment was sarcastic and hostile and dismissive of his point. It may not be incorrect, but it's the kind of thing I'd expect to see on /r/politics and come to HN to avoid.