You can't claim that serving static content from a read-only filesystem is "de rigueur", and that securing your DNS registration is "fort knox". I think the po

You can't claim that serving static content from a read-only filesystem is "de rigueur", and that securing your DNS registration is "fort knox". I think the point was that the OP was claiming static content from a read-only filesystem as the solution, and the reply was pointing out that this is hardly the best or first actions. I would personally expect that the openssl group is suffering some embarrassment, but this sort of hack is a risk of the business. Hopefully we get a good writeup.