4 ms·
I wonder if this was as much work as I suspect it was.
by diminoten 13y ago
I wonder if this was as much work as I suspect it was.
- tracker1 13y agoDepends on the complexity of their schema, and how many and of what complexity any stored procedures they relied on were.
- DrJokepu 13y agoIn many ways PostgreSQL is fairly similar to Oracle and it also supports its own version of PL/SQL. There are tools to automate migration of both schema and data. I reckon the real difficulty of such a transition is updating application code (and legacy code) to work with PostgreSQL.
- midas007 13y agoThis is by design because EnterpriseDB (based on Postgres) is basically intended as a replacment for Oracle. Anything commercial that uses fancy Oracle features would want to look at this because it would be easier to support.
- raverbashing 13y agoThis is the real story "Migrating from Oracle to PSQL" means almost nothing (from a technical point of view) But what were the issues? How did their schema look like then and now? Any stored procedures? Any Oracle-only features that had to be migrated? Any PSQL-only features now being used?
- diminoten 13y agoHaving worked on this team (QA side) for 3 years, I'm "just guessing" this was a big effort. Very cool Mark Kosters and Andy Newton gave the dev team the bandwidth to do this, their plates are almost always full of new features and whatnot.