his (daniel brown's) position seems consistent to me - it may have had a backdoor, but it wasn't obvious that it did, it was documented how to avoid the risk, a

his (daniel brown's) position seems consistent to me - it may have had a backdoor, but it wasn't obvious that it did, it was documented how to avoid the risk, and it's the only prng with a proof (apparently - i wouldn't know...). why are we so angry with him? is he the nsa? did he get the money? he seems to work for certicom, not rsa.