3 ms·
This is not, strictly speaking, totally accurate. Praxeology doesn't necessarily agree with this viewpoint.
by icelancer 13y ago
This is not, strictly speaking, totally accurate. Praxeology doesn't necessarily agree with this viewpoint.
- jshen 13y agoThat's why you shouldn't follow Austrian economics. Edit: also, Austrian economics is like pseudoscience, it isn't representative of real economics
- icelancer 13y agoSome would say that the Keynesian model is psuedoscience for having untestable priors. I don't have a dog in the fight but neither do I think your screed against Austrian economics is an airtight argument.
- jshen 13y agoWhich model fits reality better? I think the answer is clear given the evidence. Edit: what are the priors you are speaking of.