4 ms·
But does Bitcoin really have a floor related to the energy put into the mining? Since the energy cost is paid for by the miners, do other players in Bitcoin "r
by jamroom 13y ago
But does Bitcoin really have a floor related to the energy put into the mining? Since the energy cost is paid for by the miners, do other players in Bitcoin "respect" that floor? I don't see that - there's nothing keeping a Bitcoin from going all the way to zero - regardless of the energy consumed in it's production, and Krugman argues that gold (and the feds) have a bottom that is greater than zero.
My understanding could be wrong, as my understanding of Bitcoin would definitely be at the "noob" level :)
- sans-serif 13y agoNo, the floor is unrelated to the energy put into mining. The intrinsic value of Bitcoin is the ability to facilitate financial transactions. Brinks' entire CIT vehicle business is based upon just a subset of this function, and we can agree their value is not zero.
- kordless 13y agoBitcoin is able to facilitate transactions because of the power put into the computers running the Bitcoin network. Mining Bitcoin provides the functionality for validating the block chain. So, power into the network provides the value of security.
- dcc1 13y agoNewer mining equipment doesnt use as much electricity. Power is a variable but not an important one.
- gnaritas 13y agoBitcoin happens to currently use power that way, other coins don't; mining is not the only way to facilitate transactions and facilitating transactions is where the value is, regardless of the method used to do it. Power is but one of several options so the value can't be there.
- mcguire 13y agoSo, bitcoin's ability to store value is due to its ability to be a medium of exchange?
- chipsy 13y agoI think Bitcoin does have a soft floor because that cost would form the natural price target for a miner trying to trade, but the cost is avoidable by switching to proof of stake as done in PeerCoin and Nxt. The crypto problems solved in Bitcoin don't have the intrinsic utility of a precious metal; you could make a better argument for something like PrimeCoin, which attacks a major computation problem, having this kind of utility. So as I see it Bitcoin is already obsolete; there are new coins that achieve the transaction capabilities for cheaper - they can be used in more potential applications, thus they're more interesting speculative instruments. The specific benefit of proof of work mining comes in insuring more people have a chance to enter during initial distribution, but it still massively favors the early entrants and especially the people who have the hardware environment to mine efficiently.
- dnautics 13y ago"The crypto problems solved in Bitcoin don't have the intrinsic utility of a precious metal." So gold was used extensively 2000-3000 years ago. Exactly what was its intrinsic utility then? Plating astronaut helmets and high-conductivity, corrosion-resistant electronics? The intrinsic utility of gold was that it was eminently verifable. It's got a characteristic ductility and it was a yellow metal. You could easily verify if it was 100%, 80% etc. In other words, to the ancients, the intrinsic utility of gold was "its trust model". Sound familiar?
- aes 13y agoJewelry.
- dnautics 13y agothat's not in any way "intrinsic" value.
- thaumasiotes 13y agoYes it is. The intrinsic value of food is that you can eat it; the intrinsic value of art objects is that you like them. All "intrinsic" value refers to is the use you can make of something without exchanging it for something else. If you were the only person in the world, and you appreciated the appearance of gold, than gold would be intrinsically valuable to you.