I tend too agree, there again I'd disagree on any form of descrimination, sex included and let us not touch upon the implied age factor as well. Fact is there

I tend too agree, there again I'd disagree on any form of descrimination, sex included and let us not touch upon the implied age factor as well. Fact is there are many EU `groups` that have black in the title and not deemed racist by law - good example would be the Black Police association http://www.nbpa.co.uk/ http://www.nbpa.co.uk/ . Now there might not be a White Police association and with that again is another product of dealing with descrimination and yet at the same time sets a bad example without intent. One way to look at this is would people be equaly or less offended if it said "White" instead of Black and with that why not stop there and have "Yellow", "Brown", see when you do that it starts to stand out as more offencive than having "Black" and that is perhaps a whole avenue of psycology than I'm up for. In short I personaly think it and any descrimination that you have no control over is wrong, you can't pick your skin colour or gender and with that any form of descrimination be it positive or negative is setting a bad example in society when it is only trying to restore balance albiet in a way that creates inbalance in a form it is trying to prevent. Still for every rule there is an exception, least programming teaches this.