3 ms·
> What would make you pay to read this article? I'd have to expect the article to be reasonably capable of surprising me with well researched, well formulated
by 6d0debc071 13y ago
> What would make you pay to read this article?
I'd have to expect the article to be reasonably capable of surprising me with well researched, well formulated arguments that change how I think about the issue. I don't think a paper that provides such a promise exists.
Being in the position of not having read the article my only information on it is it's an opinion piece about education and it's in the WSJ.
So I don't expect it to be well researched, well formulated, or surprising. "Oh, well, it's an opinion" -well, look: opinions are cheap enough that excellent opinions on the subject, from very intelligent people, are just given away:
http://www.lambdassociates.org/blog/decline.htm http://www.lambdassociates.org/blog/decline.htm
And I don't consider all opinions equal in the first place, there are various degrees of being informed, various degrees of bias.
I could write an opinion piece about how gutted I was to go to university and realise that by and large I'd already surpassed the curriculum in my own studies. How I went to university to be asked questions and go and find the answers, not to sit in a lecture hall listening to some toff read their powerpoint stack at us while we tried not to fall asleep. How even if you wanted to try something hard and new, (and could find something,) the fact is that university is competitive vs your other classmates, and if you try something hard and none of your classmates do - given that the courses will offer equal points (points only being given on time in the lectures and not on 'hardness' - all course being scored out of 20 - thus better to take multiple easy courses and score well in them than a few hard courses and score mediocre, even if you've learned a lot more in the latter) then you'll get worse grades than them.
... But, really, would you pay to hear me say that? I hope not.
As long as most papers are written for most people, and most people don't put much study in to events that don't directly impact their lives, the value of such is going to be low to me. Reducible almost entirely to the headline that an event took place - commentary as something skimmed over if bothered with at all.