4 ms·
the statement issues by RBI earlier, said that anyone who would be found to be dealing in bitcoin, would be considered violating FEMA. As someone said above, mo
by rikacomet 13y ago
the statement issues by RBI earlier, said that anyone who would be found to be dealing in bitcoin, would be considered violating FEMA. As someone said above, money laundering is a big issue in India. On the financial side of things, it is very hard even for seasoned "hawala" operators to launder any money. Bitcoin is undoing that in Indian context, no matter how you see it.
And the fact the silkroad used bitcoin, doesn't help things either.
- ashray 13y agothe statement issues by RBI earlier, said that anyone who would be found to be dealing in bitcoin, would be considered violating FEMA Where is this statement ? I only have: http://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/BS_PressReleaseDisplay.aspx?prid=30247 http://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/BS_PressReleaseDisplay.aspx?pr... Was there another statement from the RBI ?
- rikacomet 13y agoIts there "The absence of information of counterparties in such peer-to-peer anonymous/ pseudonymous systems could subject the users to unintentional breaches of anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) laws. " anti-money laundering = FEMA, there is no law called AML, there are two laws: FEMA & PMLA. As per the investigation, the right clauses are applied.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]