3 ms·
> "I was thinking, "please don't be Chinese" when I read the title. Fuck." Why, is this "a thing"? The closest thing I can think off the top of my head as ano
by Crito 13y ago
> "I was thinking, "please don't be Chinese" when I read the title. Fuck."
Why, is this "a thing"? The closest thing I can think off the top of my head as another example is Hwang Woo-suk, but he was Korean.
This wiki page doesn't seem to have many Chinese names: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_misconduct http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_misconduct
- 001sky 13y agogoogle: asian pressure to succeed yeilds 7.660 million results Its a generic and terrible stereotype, but then again | data http://www.realclearscience.com/2013/09/30/china039s_black_market_for_scientific_fraud_255306.html http://www.realclearscience.com/2013/09/30/china039s_black_m... http://www.economist.com/news/china/21586845-flawed-system-judging-research-leading-academic-fraud-looks-good-paper http://www.economist.com/news/china/21586845-flawed-system-j... http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/07/world/asia/07fraud.html?pagewanted=all http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/07/world/asia/07fraud.html?pa... http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-12/02/china-academic-scandal http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-12/02/china-academi... Again, not any excuse for an overzealous association but the data are out there.