4 ms·

By far the biggest mobile-website sin for me is that a high percentage of sites that auto-redirect to a mobile version actually don't work right at all: - Redi

by chavesn 13y ago

By far the biggest mobile-website sin for me is that a high percentage of sites that auto-redirect to a mobile version actually don't work right at all: - Redirects to home page - Page not found on mobile site - Mobile version has reduced features that were the primary reason for visiting the page - Redirecting to new mobile-specific URLs that make sharing with desktop users difficult (or impossible!) - No way to not get the mobile version (no link, or doesn't remember preference). If auto-redirect actually suited the visitor's needs, then in many cases it would be fine. Instead, I find that many seem to be implemented in the most naive way -- probably one of those circumstances where a novice developer said to the site owner, "automatically showing the mobile site to mobile visitors is EASY!".

baddox 13y ago
The first example infuriates me. Who in their right mind redirects from something like a specific product page to the mobile home page?
- kijin 13y ago
  This is actually somewhat understandable (even if still unforgivable) if you think about how typical non-technical businesses get their mobile websites done. The desktop site was created first, and the mobile site was added much later. Often, the two sites aren't even on the same server(s) because the mobile site was contracted out to a different agency that uses an incompatible technology. My most recent freelance gig was to unify two websites run by the same organization. One was written in PHP 4.4 and the other was written in ASP.NET. The only thing they share is the database, and even that might be handled by an export+import batch job (.vbs anyone?) rather than actually sharing the same database, because none of the ORMs are compatible with one another. So what happens is that whoever maintains the desktop website has no idea how the mobile website works, and vice versa. If you pay them another grand or two, they might be able to figure out which URLs in one website correspond to which URLs in the other website, but the client probably cut that from the spec. Hence http://xkcd.com/869/ http://xkcd.com/869/
  - chavesn 13y ago
    Yes, exactly! What I don't get is how hard it would be for someone to say "Hmm, maybe redirecting to the home page is actually a pretty awful idea. If that's the best we can do, maybe we should only auto-redirect pages where we actually know the equivalent (static pages and such) until we can afford a better solution." As a side note, I've just realized it's things like this that are why I can't stand front-ends that are built on or tightly integrated with the same ORM the backend uses.
manojlds 13y ago
Google has recently started penalizing sites that redirect to a different page for mobile.

by chavesn 13y ago

baddox 13y ago

The first example infuriates me. Who in their right mind redirects from something like a specific product page to the mobile home page?

kijin 13y ago
This is actually somewhat understandable (even if still unforgivable) if you think about how typical non-technical businesses get their mobile websites done. The desktop site was created first, and the mobile site was added much later. Often, the two sites aren't even on the same server(s) because the mobile site was contracted out to a different agency that uses an incompatible technology. My most recent freelance gig was to unify two websites run by the same organization. One was written in PHP 4.4 and the other was written in ASP.NET. The only thing they share is the database, and even that might be handled by an export+import batch job (.vbs anyone?) rather than actually sharing the same database, because none of the ORMs are compatible with one another. So what happens is that whoever maintains the desktop website has no idea how the mobile website works, and vice versa. If you pay them another grand or two, they might be able to figure out which URLs in one website correspond to which URLs in the other website, but the client probably cut that from the spec. Hence http://xkcd.com/869/ http://xkcd.com/869/
- chavesn 13y ago
  Yes, exactly! What I don't get is how hard it would be for someone to say "Hmm, maybe redirecting to the home page is actually a pretty awful idea. If that's the best we can do, maybe we should only auto-redirect pages where we actually know the equivalent (static pages and such) until we can afford a better solution." As a side note, I've just realized it's things like this that are why I can't stand front-ends that are built on or tightly integrated with the same ORM the backend uses.

manojlds 13y ago

Google has recently started penalizing sites that redirect to a different page for mobile.