6 ms·
I've also done stuff like x <- m1; f x; x <- m 2; f x; in a do-block, and it's not clear to me how to write 'shadowfrom' (or however you prono
by velis_vel 13y ago
I've also done stuff like
x <- m1;
f x;
x <- m 2;
f x;
in a do-block, and it's not clear to me how to write 'shadowfrom' (or however you pronounce '<-' in that context).
- judk 13y agoMaybe this would be cool: x! <- m 2 Sort of like a strictness annotation. In think it would be a compatible language change, since only identifiers can currently appear left of a <-