You know how that say "If you don't stand for something you`ll fall for everything"? Well, that's just how I see it myself. Inaction is an action within itself.

You know how that say "If you don't stand for something you`ll fall for everything"? Well, that's just how I see it myself. Inaction is an action within itself. IMO, providing indiscriminate protection is not a vote for "freedom of speech", it's a vote against basic sense of morality. Case in point: http://www.bullyville.com/?page=articles&id=651 http://www.bullyville.com/?page=articles&id=651 Protecting an under age revenge porn site that hurts young adults, scaring them for live, is not a freedom of speech issue. There should be a some balance between morality and bullheaded ideology and it's called "basic sense of decency". Social awareness begins with recognizing the suffering of the victim - not with defending the rights of the villains.