6 ms·
There is one sentence missing from each graph that would've made this a lot easier to grok: "x is better" where x is more requests, faster startup time, or les
by w0rd-driven 13y ago
There is one sentence missing from each graph that would've made this a lot easier to grok:
"x is better" where x is more requests, faster startup time, or less memory usage.
I prefer graphs that lead me to what I should expect and that sentence would go a long way to eliminate the "mental math" I had to do to understand each one.
On another note, the 2 year graphs are particularly interesting. They're more consistent than not but those inconsistencies seem a little awkward.
- brianhempel 13y agoThe variance is sometimes due to RVM troubles. The benchmark is partly a test of the entire Ruby ecosystem. If RVM is bugging, then people are installing sub-optimal implementations. For example: https://github.com/wayneeseguin/rvm/issues/1418 https://github.com/wayneeseguin/rvm/issues/1418