>> And how would "preferred form for making modifications" be defined? > In the same way that you define source code, or what modifications means. That is obvi

>> And how would "preferred form for making modifications" be defined? > In the same way that you define source code, or what modifications means. That is obvious, why are you telling me this? > However, I think any programer would have a hard time arguing that the preferred form for modifications on binary file is not the source code. I wasn't talking about binary files, of course I am referring to the source code.