3 ms·
AFAICS it doesn't meet all aspects of the TV world's 4K spec, specifically the new colour regime. (99% of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_RGB_color_space ht
by leoc 13y ago
AFAICS it doesn't meet all aspects of the TV world's 4K spec, specifically the new colour regime. (99% of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_RGB_color_space https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_RGB_color_space has to be a smaller colour space than https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rec._2020 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rec._2020 surely.)
- profquail 13y agoThe article you linked on Rec. 2020 says: > In coverage of the CIE 1931 color space the Rec. 2020 color space covers 75.8%, the digital cinema reference projector color space covers 53.6%, the Adobe RGB color space covers 52.1%, and the Rec. 709 color space covers 35.9%. So yes, Adobe RGB covers less of the reference color space than Rec. 2020 (4k/UHD), but more than Rec. 709 (HDTV).
- lcrs 13y agoNo display of any kind meets the Rec. 2020 gamut spec. It's more a future proofing step than a realistic target. The fact that the primaries are sat right on the single-wavelength line indicates an eye towards future laser projectors though - the gory details of how the decisions were made start at page 27 of http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-r/opb/rep/R-REP-BT.2246-2-2012-PDF-E.pdf http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-r/opb/rep/R-REP-BT.2246-2-201...