2 ms·
Right. That much I got. The part about "non-solution to a non-problem" refers how the author thought that not only is the interface a non-solution, but that h
by iamwil 17y ago
Right. That much I got.
The part about "non-solution to a non-problem" refers how the author thought that not only is the interface a non-solution, but that having datasets and visualizations would be useless to lay people (a non-problem).
I was asking the question whether it's really a non-problem. I figured that a nutritional label is a bad example, and that if WA had sports stats or product comparison data, the lay person might be very interesting, hence upgrading WA to a "non-solution to a problem"
- ori_b 17y agoI gathered that the "non-problem" that was being discussed was the need for natural language input, not the actual visualization.