3 ms·
Of course. That said, Clojure doesn't have those, given that it has a dynamic type system and destructuring instead of pattern matching (not as clean, IMHO), so
by wonderzombie 13y ago
Of course. That said, Clojure doesn't have those, given that it has a dynamic type system and destructuring instead of pattern matching (not as clean, IMHO), so a comparison to Haskell in this respect is less useful.
- catnaroek 13y agoMy point was that it is perfectly possible to be familiar with Haskell and find Clojure (and Lisps in general) puzzling. On the other hand, I would be genuinely surprised if someone familiar with Haskell were unable to pick up ML, or vice versa.
- dkersten 13y agoIf you want pattern matching, check out core.match
- catnaroek 13y agoWhere is the exhaustiveness checking?