4 ms·
Should be captioned (2008)
by heydenberk 13y ago
Should be captioned (2008)
- oscilloscope 13y agoIt was first published in 2005 according to the URL and comment permalinks.
- infruset 13y agoReferences all the way to 1998 can be found over the internet these days..
- Gravityloss 13y agoBut can they be trusted? How much do google and archive.org control?
- bachback 13y agoyes, and according to webarchive. strangely Nagy's post is gone in the archive, but present today. perhaps some quirk in blogger or webarchive.
- jqhart 13y agoThis means Nagy didn't comment until after the archive date. He probably commented when it was re-posted in 2008.
- hendzen 13y agoLook at the URL. Blogspot allows you to retroactively change the date, but the URL stays the same. Obviously one might wonder why he changed the date.
- jqhart 13y agoNope, 2005. http://classic-web.archive.org/web/20060329122942/http://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2005/12/bit-gold.html http://classic-web.archive.org/web/20060329122942/http://une... Blogger updates the date in the article but not in the URL if you repost something you posted earlier.