"Your" mind and "my" mind are not discrete entities, under the description of quantum systems.[0][1]. When you measure the fluorescence lifetime of ruby, f

"Your" mind and "my" mind are not discrete entities, under the description of quantum systems.[0][1]. When you measure the fluorescence lifetime of ruby, for instance, you only measure the presence of emitted photons on a quantum physical way, which implies the collapse of the system’s quantum state, but you measure the time at which the photodetector gets activated by simultaneously reading a clock in a classical way. That is a very strange feature of the quantum/classical dichotomy of the Copenhagen interpretation, and it leaves one very basic question completely open: There is no way to predict quantum physically when the quantum measurement process and the collapse of the quantum state will take place, or even to find out the time distribution of the measurement process in a statistical way. The Copenhagen interpretation only defines the statistical distribution of the possible measurement results assuming a measurement is being performed at a given time, but doesn’t tell anything about the conditions under which a quantum measurement will actually happen – basically because measuring is considered as an act taking place in the classical world, which escapes quantum physical description.[2] [0]: "You and I". Sebastian Rödl. Universität Basel. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/47805860/Articles/Roedl_youandI.pdf https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/47805860/Articles/Roedl_... [1]: "Quantum". Aha Hah. https://gomockingbird.com/mockingbird/#xl6a68x/NLd6c9 https://gomockingbird.com/mockingbird/#xl6a68x/NLd6c9 [2]: "Quantum Ethics". Sébastien Fauvel. https://github.com/quantum-ethics/quantum-ethics https://github.com/quantum-ethics/quantum-ethics