3 ms·
Except that Microsoft innovated, got there first and clearly has something valuable if other companies are using it's IP (self evident since companies are payin
by X-Istence 13y ago
Except that Microsoft innovated, got there first and clearly has something valuable if other companies are using it's IP (self evident since companies are paying them licensing fees).
- codygman 13y agoThe reason for paying licensing fees doesn't have to be that Micro$oft has something valuable, it could very well be they are afraid of legal repercussions.
- clarky07 13y agoIf they weren't infringing, the companies wouldn't be paying. It's not like we are talking about some mom and pop that is going to go out of business from legal fees. We are talking major handset manufacturers.
- AnthonyMouse 13y agoIt's not about going out of business, it's about cost/benefit. What good does it do you to avoid paying a million dollars in license fees if it costs you two million dollars in lawyers fees to do it? (The answer is that it keeps you from being painted as a mark by other trolls. But it still doesn't change the math -- it costs more to fight than to pay.)
- pyre 13y ago> self evident since companies are paying them licensing fees Not necessarily. Companies could be paying them licensing fees because it's less costly then a protracted court battle with an unknown outcome.