3 ms·
Oh, for heaven's sake. Now that he's gone and written this template, what the hell are we going to talk about on HN? Everything is ruined.
by sramsay 13y ago
Oh, for heaven's sake. Now that he's gone and written this template, what the hell are we going to talk about on HN?
Everything is ruined.
- klibertp 13y agoOn the first glance this seems like a complete list of "language wars fallacies", but I'm 100% sure people will still come up with many variations on those and call them arguments. Just as they did for the past... half a century? So no need to worry, next time there is some PHP thread you'll see exactly the same thing you're used to. Anyway, it's very well written and it provides a framework for selecting threads and comments to ignore. While I had a vague idea how to recognize unproductive flames now I have a solid template, which can be a great time saver. Now I wish for someone to write this for "editor wars" as well!
- RyanZAG 13y agoThe way people talk about it is hopefully ruined for some - if this makes a couple people stop to think that their reasons for championing a language are flawed then this is one awesome post. (yes, I know you're being sarcastic) However, the discussion on issues such as type-safe vs not are still going to come up because they really are useful discussions because there isn't a right or wrong answer. It's like arguing if you should take the train or a car. In a general sense it's not a useful question, but in a specific sense it is very useful. Should I take the train or a car when going between specific X and Y is actually still a useful discussion and an important decision.