3 ms·
Sorry I replied to this one late. I was waiting til I had a bit more free time to reply to this one seriously. You have a ton of great suggestions in here, all
by kennyledet 13y ago
Sorry I replied to this one late. I was waiting til I had a bit more free time to reply to this one seriously.
You have a ton of great suggestions in here, all taken into consideration and this will definitely help the repo be much better by tomorrow. I will get on it. Thank you.
Most helpful post in the thread vs. "lel it's already been done xD links to wiki site"
>On the other hand, this could become the repository to check for a weird "2x faster with smaller memory usage" implementation of a red-black tree, or a clever general number sieve, etc.
Precisely my aim. Thanks for understanding this!! Apparently other people think I'm trying to make it a primary learning resource or something...
- mkl 13y agoMissing from the discussion seems to be the subject of licenses. Some of the files have one and some don't (making using the code murky), so you should probably establish a rule of an explicit BSD license or something. "Public domain" isn't suitable as some countries make it difficult or impossible for people to give up copyright (that's why CC0 exists, but I'm not sure how well that works for code).
- kennyledet 13y agoAh yes, you're right. I didn't think far enough into it before I pushed the initial commit. I guess I was just excited, but this is perhaps one of the most important changes that need to be made. Thank you for bringing this to the forefront of my mind, it will be a new convention now.