3 ms·
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&charset=(detect+automatically)&doctype=Inline&group=0 http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F
by hko 17y ago
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&charset=(detect+automatically)&doctype=Inline&group=0 http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.co...
- profquail 17y agoSo, because Google is invalid as well, then we should all strive to write our pages with malformed and non-accessible HTML?
- bmelton 17y agoI think the point is that if a given site is no more busted than one of the most widely used sites on the internet, the fact that it doesn't validate is a minor concern.