2 ms·
Or maybe KeePass is redundant with KeePassX available. The KeePass model of development is not very appealing to contributors or anyone who might want to revie
by sparkie 13y ago
Or maybe KeePass is redundant with KeePassX available.
The KeePass model of development is not very appealing to contributors or anyone who might want to review the code for security. KeePass has no official public repository and only has a dump of the source code for each version the author releases. (Although some people have turned them into repos, the lack of proper commit logs means it's not very easy to see exactly what is being changed[1])
On the other hand, KeePassX is developed in the open like most open source software. I think I'd rather trust that people are reviewing the code here.
[1]:https://github.com/dlech/keepass2/commit/6c87c0a9c8e34558de9e1a55e9f67fe780bc6bc8 https://github.com/dlech/keepass2/commit/6c87c0a9c8e34558de9...